Archive for April, 2006

PCCI and PPA combine to resurrect EO59

Monday, April 17th, 2006

“Back to single operator for N. Harbor privatization” declares the Malaya shipping news item dated April 17, 2006.  The story details indicate how the PCCI and the PPA have connived to resurrect an issue which was even included in the original charges on the impeachment of President Estrada when he ordered the PPA to implement the privatization of the entire Philippine port system to be managed by a single operator made up of a consortium of industry biggies who paraded as presidential cronies.

The mother of Ricardo Saludo, the Deputy Presidential Spokesperson at the Office of the President captured the PCCI presidency that has been some kind of a musical chair game between Donald Dee, Sergio Ortiz-Luis and Miguel Varela in 2004.  Noemi Saludo also became the PPA private sector representative upon the demise of her husband whom she succeeded at the PPA Board and that is how PCCI can claim to be properly represented at the PPA Board. When Donald Dee regained his seat as PCCI President in 2005, he promised the incoming officers of the Distribution Management of the Philippines (DMAP) more action at PCCI’s Transport Committee (Transcom).  This promise was made during his speech as DMAP’s inducting officer and after DMAP complained about not being a part of the Transcom deliberations during the incumbency of Ms. Saludo.

A year passed after Dee’s promise and DMAP was not been invited back into the Transcom, which is populated mostly by service providers.  Then suddenly, the PCCI announces that it has reversed its stand against monopoly at the North Harbor and convinced the PPA to bid out the operations of the North Harbor to a single operator.

During this entire period, Donald Dee became an Ambassador and Special Envoy for International Trade Negotiations, and a member to the 55-member Consultative Commission (Con-Com) on charter change.  This of course is on top of his being a Commissioner of the Social Security System (SSS).

The concurrence between PPA and the PCCI was made more compatible when PPA withdrew the Terms of Reference for the Privatization of the North Harbor (TOR) that was submitted to the NEDA for approval.  This TOR was developed using USAID assistance provided to PPA and the Coordinating Council for Private Sector Participation (CCPSP) as far back as 2002.

(To be continued)

Attention: DOTC – heed the warning

Monday, April 17th, 2006

Don’t defy Ombudsman sanctions, gov’t execs reminded
First posted 08:44am (Mla time) April 17, 2006
By Nelson F. Flores
Inquirer

OMBUDSMAN Merceditas Gutierrez has threatened with criminal and administrative charges all national and local officials who would refuse to implement sanctions imposed by her office on erring government personnel.Gutierrez, in a two-page memorandum dated April 11, reminded all national and local government officials, including heads of government owned and controlled corporations, that the law compels them to enforce any decision, orders or resolutions made or imposed by the Office of the Ombudsman.     

Gutierrez explained that, “the filing of a motion for reconsideration or a petition for review before the Office of the Ombudsman does not operate to stay the immediate implementation of the foregoing Ombudsman decisions, orders or resolutions.”

Thus, she said, implementation of an Ombudsman decision must be enforced upon receipt.

“Only a Temporary Restraining Order or a Writ of Preliminary Injunction duly issued by a court of competent jurisdiction stays the immediate implementation of the Ombudsman’s decisions, orders or resolution,” Gutierrez said.

Gutierrez’ memorandum came on the heels of the failure of Interior Secretary Ronaldo Puno to implement her suspension order on Cavite Governor Erineo “Ayong” Maliksi.

Early last week, Gutierrez ordered the implementation of Maliksi’s six-month suspension without pay after the Court of Appeals lifted a preliminary injunction that prevented his suspension earlier.

end

Click here to search the net and find out whether the CPA GM’s case is included in Ombudsman’s warning.

Ports, terminals report ‘zero crime’ on holidays

Sunday, April 16th, 2006

Ports, terminals report ‘zero crime’ on holidays” is the title of an item from Sun*Star Daily dated April 16,2006. This may be so, but certainly there is a “continuing crime” starting from the boardroom at the PPA and down the line, when it is trying to pursue again a policy which it espoused in 1998 when the PPA blatantly pursued the implementation of EO 59 which was to hand over to a consortium, the operation of all PPA ports.

(more…)

On April Fool’s Day – from the PPA!

Saturday, April 1st, 2006

PPA grants long-term contract to GenSan cargo handler

Davao City (1 April) — Following the review and qualification of incumbent cargo handling operators (CHOs) with expired or expiring probationary contracts, Philippine Ports Authority (PPA) Head Office (HO) in Manila recently awarded the ten-year management contract to South Cotabato Integrated Port Services, Inc. (SCIPSI) at the Port Management Office-General Santos.

Dubbed as “Long Term Contract for the Operations of Cargo Handling Services”, it was signed by PPA General Manager Atty. Oscar Sevilla and SCIPSI President Col. Edgardo Abesamis on February 20, 2006 and will expire on February 19, 2016.

(more…)

A favored account?

Saturday, April 1st, 2006

(Updated)

A company that was able to get favorable concessions in the previous administration is able to continue doing so at the North Harbor due to the appointment of a former employee that has owed “unbounded gratitude” to its owners. 

(more…)

Gateway to perdition

Saturday, April 1st, 2006

(Updated) 

  1. May 29, 2003 – A letter was sent to the President requesting for the investigation into the circumstances leading to the Dona Eva Macapagal Passenger Terminal at the South Harbor, which had just been inaugurated. The letter asserts that
    “We have taken time to review the events surrounding the construction of the terminal starting from the time that PPA announced the project coinciding with the third death anniversary of your mother. Based on our findings, we would like to request for an investigation into the strong possibility that the terminal project was not properly conceived and executed. It appears that the amount used for the project was sourced by ATI from the reductions in what it was supposed to pay to PPA as government’s share. This being the case, it would be quite impossible for PPA to pass on any reduction in government share to the port users, as you originally directed the PPA to implement.”     

    Furthermore, it contained “A TIMELINE OF NEWS AND EVENTS ON THE SUPER TERMINAL AT THE SOUTH HARBOR” on the details of the project.
    (more…)

Road to Perdition II

Saturday, April 1st, 2006

(Updated)

  1. What they say at the PPA. Concerned employees write a letter to a PPA Contractor.
     
  2. How the road looks like today. (June 2003)
        
  3. Letter-complaint filed with the Ombudsman requesting for an urgent investigation before the 3-km. expensive avenue will be obliterated when FF Cruz will begin their reclamation contract this coming September.
    (more…)

Newsbreak Inside Track